August 2021

The recent report by the Associated Press that “conservative, activist lawyer” Larry Klayman has filed a defamation lawsuit against me is stunning in the omission of the key facts required to satisfy journalistic integrity. The AP story which reports that gadfly lawyer Larry Klayman, has filed a defamation suit against me, was among the most obvious yet ineffective hit jobs I have read in a forty-year career in American politics.

The Associated Press failed to report this new lawsuit was but one of the eleven frivolous lawsuits Larry Klayman has filed against me on behalf of himself or his client Jerome Corsi. They also neglect to mention that two of those lawsuits have already been dismissed with the judge in one case ruling that Corsi, who was represented by Klayman, must pay my legal fees. The AP also missed the fact that there are pending motions for dismissal in other jurisdictions.

The judge in that case is now deciding how much Klayman’s client Corsi owes me. Yet another Federal Judge in Texas, who dismissed another of Klayman’s ridiculous cases against me, also ruled that Klayman is guilty of a “Rule 11 violation,” meaning that the Court will consider a motion filed by my attorneys . Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 provides that a district court may sanction attorneys or parties who submit pleadings for an improper purpose, or that contain frivolous arguments, or arguments that have no evidentiary support. This motion is now pending a decision. How in the world did The Associated Press miss this?

Incredibly, the Associated Press also failed to mention that Klayman is currently suspended from the practice of law in DC and Pennsylvania as well as the pending disciplinary actions against him in other jurisdictions. The AP also failed to report that in 2016, the Federal 11th Circuit Court of Appeals recited an Ohio judge’s finding of fact that Klayman had on more than one occasion acted in a “grossly” inappropriate manner with his own children.

While identifying Klayman as a “founder of Judicial Watch” the Associated Press fails to note that Klayman was ousted from Judicial Watch. A group he founded by his hand-picked board members and that the D.C. Circuit Court recently upheld a $2.8 million judgement against Klayman by Tom Fitton and the current Directors of Judicial Watch.

In the epic legal struggle between Judicial Watch and Klayman, the bar-suspended lawyer admitted he was pursuing a romantic relationship with a Judicial Watch employee. Klayman also admitted that to Judicial Watch about his involvement in a violent altercation with his ex-wife.

Last Wednesday however Klayman failed to appear for a scheduled deposition to be taken by my lawyers. Klayman’s excuse for missing the deposition is the Delta Variant of COVID-19 makes flying from California too dangerous. True to his hypocritical nature, Covid did not stop him from flying to Philadelphia and sponsoring a conference to re-write the Constitution.

Klayman actively opposed the act of clemency granted to me by President Donald Trump who both commuted my sentence and ultimately granted me a pardon based on the corruption of the judge, jury forewoman, and Mueller’s prosecutors in the case.

On November 3, 2020, by Court order, the US Department of Justice was forced to release the last remaining unredacted section of Special Counsel Robert Mueller report. In which he conceded that he had “no factual evidence” against me regarding Russian collusion, WikiLeaks collaboration, or the alleged theft in the publication of John Podesta’s embarrassing e-mails. 

Other than BuzzFeed who admitting that Stone was “vindicated;” the very mainstream media outlets who held for two years that I was a traitor and a Russian spy, failed to report this stunning admission of exculpatory evidence. How does one lie about events that one’s not involved in?

When Klayman is ultimately deposed, I will ask him how many times he met with Mueller’s prosecutors in their joint effort to destroy me based on his fury over my pardon and vindication. I have high regard for Tom Fitton, and the current management of Judicial Watch, who I believe does an incredible job holding the Government, the Courts, and the media accountable.

It’s bad enough that I must vigorously defend against a Biden DOJ civil complaint that was cooked up to satisfy the bloodlust on the American left who won’t stop attempting to destroy me. This complaint falsely implies that I have evaded taxes, when in fact, I have declared every penny of income that should be taxed and have hidden nothing. The Government’s case is stunning in that virtually every one of its assertions is not only inaccurate but can be easily and indisputably proven to be false and therefore a fraud upon the Court.

While I have no interest in settling this civil suit, I am looking forward to being vindicated in federal court in Miami regarding the heavy-handed tax case. I am grateful to the judge in the case for granting a 90-day delay to my lawyers based on the fact that my wife was shockingly diagnosed with stage four cancer. Mrs. Stone is the chief custodian of all of our business and tax records but she’s too ill at this time to participate fully in her own defense.

Klayman refused to delay one of his harassment lawsuits based on the Federal Judge’s examination of my wife’s current health and a ninety-day grant of delay. Klayman also refused to accept a statement from my wife’s doctor, insisting instead that I sign an affidavit and record a video asserting that my wife is battling stage 4 cancer. Unsatisfied that both a federal judge and the head of the University and Miami Sylvester Cancer Center both certified my wife’s battle with cancer, Klayman insisted on the continued harassment of my wife and family.

Many will recall when Klayman posted a seven-and-a-half-hour video when he was allowed to depose me in one of his completely bogus harassment suits. The assholes at Politico took the thirty-second byte out of a seven-and-a-half-hour struggle in which, for anyone who bothered to watch the entire deposition, I plaid rope-a-dope with this clown. The video of my deposition actually reveals what a buffoon Klayman is, not to mention the entire lack of evidence to support any of his fraudulent litigations against me.

Larry Klayman, the legal tough guy, is ducking my court-ordered deposition because he knows that the questioning will reveal additional unethical behavior on his part. Including the 11th Circuit decision regarding his creepy touching of his own children, as well as the circumstances in which he was actually ousted from the very organization that he founded by hand-picked people he supposedly controlled. I also have instructed my attorneys to question Klayman vigorously about the finances of his current non-profit organization “Freedom Watch,” which I believe is currently in violation of its IRS tax status. Additionally, I intend to explore an incident in which Klayman was temporarily detained at the Miami International Airport by TSA because he objected to TSA’s insistence that he put his cat through an inspection, saying “don’t worry, the cat isn’t carrying a bomb.”

My lawyers also intend to hone in on Klayman’s handling of the legal defense funds of some of his clients, questions I doubt the discredited Klayman wants to answer given their potential tax and ethical implications. Larry Klayman can run but cannot hide.

The Associated Press should terminate the reporter who failed to mention that Klayman is suspended from the bar in D.C. and Pennsylvania, that a federal judge in Nevada barred Klayman from practicing in that federal circuit, and that Klayman had been removed from Judicial Watch. They also neglect to inform the reader that this latest lawsuit is one of eleven actions Klayman has brought against me (two of which have already been dismissed), or Klayman’s notification to the Court that he would not be appearing for his court-ordered deposition a mere thirty minute before that deposition. How can any honest or qualified reporter omit these salient facts?

Thanks to the vicious, malicious, fabricated effort of Mueller and his confederates, who tried to bankrupt me, after I refused to lie for them. Followed by the recycled smear that I was somehow involved in or complicit in the illegal acts of January 6th, as well as the Biden DOJ civil suit against my wife and I, I must now also raise a sufficient amount of money in my Legal Defense Fund to finance my defense. I am being attacked by a discredited lawyer whose lawsuits against me are laughable in their lack of merit, and whose written submissions to the Courts are childish, idiotic, and delusional. I am most interested in asking Klayman under oath when the last time was that he won a favorable verdict in state or federal court, or when any court granted one of his motions. Unsurprisingly, having attempted to smear me in his ham-handed incompetent deposition, he lacks the fortitude to confront his life-long record of ethical abuses, incompetence, falsehoods, and unrequited egomania.

Larry Klayman was allowed to depose me on the same day that the news broke exposing the epic corruption of the jury forewoman in my case, who had attacked me on Twitter and Facebook in 2019. Any personal animous would disqualify her from serving on my jury, but even worse they were regarding the very case in which she would be selected as a juror. She kept her account private during jury selection, trial, and deliberation only to delete them only after participating in my lynching. Klayman insisted in the deposition that “by the time his case against me got to trial I would already be in federal prison.” “No,” I replied, “by the time this case is dismissed, I will be a free man but you, Larry, will be disbarred.”

The facts that will be revealed when a judge ultimately orders Klayman’s deposition will only hasten his inevitable exile from the practice of law.

For me, the events of January 6th became a matter of “déjà vu all over again,” as legendary New York Yankees baseball coach Casey Stengel once said. Because I am a forty-year friend and advisor to President Donald Trump and because I spoke at two legally permitted rallies on January 5th and because I expressed reservations about the record number of irregularities and anomalies in the results of the 2020 election, it quickly became an article of faith among left-wing haters in the blogosphere that I was somehow complicit, if not the “mastermind” of the politically counterproductive and contrived events of January 6^th.

In fact, here is the statement I released to Gateway Pundit on June 28^th, 2021 –

Let me say it again, any statement, claim, insinuation, or report alleging, or even implying, that I had any involvement in or knowledge of the commission of any unlawful acts by any person or group in or around the U.S. Capitol or anywhere in Washington, D.C. on January 6, 2021, is categorically false. And, there is no evidence to the contrary nor any witness who can truthfully and honestly testify differently. Period.”

It was accurate then, and as the world learned last Friday according to Reuters, is accurate today. The distortionists who dominate media today created a far different impression in their baseless coverage.

Reprising their role in the “Russian Collusion” fiasco in which CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and the rest of the corporate news jackals insisted that I was a “Russian traitor” and that I had received stolen data from Julian Assange of WikiLeaks and passed it on to the Trump campaign. Although the long-hidden sections of the Special Counsel’s final Report revealed that Robert Mueller, with his unlimited legal reach, authority, unlimited budget, and with the sophisticated surveillance technology of the U.S. Government, in active violation of my Fourth Amendment Rights, could never find any evidence of.

Despite the nothing burger of Mueller’s final Report and his failure to take Trump down, as well as the declassified documents that ultimately proved the illegitimate and political attack from the entire Mueller jihad, the Democrats and their allies in the fake news media never abandoned this false narrative. New York Times reporter Michael S. Schmidt won a Pulitzer Prize for promulgating lies promoting a completely false and discredited narrative regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election. If Schmidt had any journalistic integrity, he would return the Pulitzer and confess his dishonesty.

Even though the only charges Robert Mueller and his staff could ultimately cook up were contrived “lying to Congress” charges – despite the fact that no misstatement I made to Congress was material or hid any underlying crime or conspiracy and thus did not violate the False Statements Act, as well as a fabricated “witness tampering” charge in which I was accused of threatening to steal the dog of a Grand Jury witness who testified (falsely) against me. Total bullshit.

How ironic that the witness I was accused of tampering with, Randy Credico, threatened to shoot an exculpatory Grand Jury witness in my case in the head if he contradicted Credico on the stand. Although Mueller’s thugs had documentation of the written threat, Mueller stooge, Randy Credico, was not charged with witness tampering.

The killing fields of the D.C. Federal District Court were efficient, but it was also sloppy. My obvious railroading in the D.C. Court, despite the best efforts of the mainstream media to misreport the actual events in the courtroom and their implication, woke millions of Americans to the unfairness of my prosecution and brought me the prayers and support of millions of outraged Americans who have sustained me, my wife and my family. Sadly, between their smears regarding January 6^th, a completely fraudulent civil complaint by the Biden Justice Department regarding my back taxes, and my wife’s valiant struggle against cancer, the stress and financial pressure on our family has persisted unabated.

Mueller insisted that my trial must take place before Judge Amy Berman Jackson because she was presiding over what he claimed was a “related” case of seventeen Russians who were charged with hacking. In fact, Mueller’s prosecutors promised the judge that they would present evidence at my trial that was gleaned from the search warrants in the Russian case. They, of course, produced no such thing because no such thing exists. This is a fraud upon the Court based on no evidence.

Every one of Judge Amy Berman Jackson’s pre-trial rulings for the Government was patently unconstitutional, but the most egregious was a ruling that I could not use the issue of corruption or misconduct by Mueller’s prosecutors, the FBI, the DOJ, or any member of Congress in my defense. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in Kyles v. Whitley that the corruption of the investigation and indictment is always fair grounds for legal defense. Why would the Government move to bar any discussion of their misconduct or corruption in my case if there was none to bar?

Not only did Judge Jackson manage to keep the phony Crowdstrike report from the public without which there is no evidence that “the Russians” hacked the DNC, and, in fact, Crowdstrike executives later testified that they had no such proof either. This admission was, of course, classified because it undercut the Deep State narrative.

In her unhinged fifty-five-minute harangue at me during sentencing, Judge Jackson admitted that she increased my sentence because I had the audacity to question the legitimacy of the Mueller Investigation which, of course, I have a First Amendment right to so. Based on the declassification of government documents in the final days of the Trump Administration and on Mueller’s own final Report, the legitimacy and legality of the Mueller Investigation is no longer disputed. Judge Jackson owes me an apology but once again the Judge demonstrated that she was, as Tucker Carlson said, a “capricious authoritarianism of a Democratic activist wearing robes.”

Judge Jackson violated my First, Fourth, and Sixth Amendment rights at trial, as well as withholding exculpatory evidence that the Federal Courts would ultimately pry from Mueller. Both the prosecutors and the Judge herself withheld Mueller’s stunning conclusion that they had “no factual evidence” against me pertaining to “Russian Collusion,” WikiLeaks collaboration or the publication of John Podesta’s embarrassing e-mails.

Because this fact would have completely undercut their contrived “lying to Congress” fabricated charge against me, they hid it from us at trial. Their argument, that they had no obligation to give it to us under the Giglio decision because it doesn’t pertain directly to the charges against me, fails to recognize that the first eight pages of my indictment claim that the Russians hacked the DNC and gave the information to WikiLeaks, something Mueller has no evidence of, as well as no evidence that I was involved in any such endeavor. One cannot lie about events that one neither has knowledge of nor is involved in. Andrew Weissman, who crafted my indictment is not nearly as clever as he thinks he is, and a blockbuster book; “PITBULL,” by Defense Attorney David Schoen on Weissman’s life-long record of legal misconduct, and a documentary based on that book, will be out in January.

The jury forewoman attacked me by name on Twitter and Facebook in 2019 in regard to the actual case in which she was later selected as a juror, kept those posts on a private setting during jury selection and the trial, and deleted them afterward. In the jaw-dropper, Judge Jackson ruled that the jury for a woman’s actions did not demonstrate bias against me because the judge insisted that the jury for a woman had no way of knowing in 2019 that I was an associate of Donald Trump.

Is it a completely contrived narrative by the prosecutors in my case who justified a seven to nine-year sentence recommendation by penalizing me for numerous crimes I had neither been charged with nor convicted of, such as the false assertion that I threatened a federal judge or that I violated the Judge’s gag order with the publication of my book “The Myth of Russian Collusion” although the book was published and released before the judge’s gag on me was ordered?

After blindsiding their DOJ superiors with a sentencing recommendation for more draconian than the actual convictions required and then claiming Barr’s DOJ Officials had pressured them to recommend a more lenient sentence, the four Obama and Clinton-connected prosecutors in my case created a firestorm out of fiction.

Spoon-feeding this shit to their friends at The Washington Post, The New York Times, and CNN they created a “factoid”- that Barr interfered in my sentencing on behalf of Trump. That is a simple disprovable lie. Because three of the four prosecutors are no longer in government service, they cannot be disciplined for their unethical behavior. However, public exposure of their corruption is yet to come. Cockroaches run from sunlight.

While four of these prosecutors were smart enough to weave this tale of interference in the sentencing process by the Attorney General to reporters and in op-eds they were also wise enough never to state it under oath. None of these prosecutors could stand up to questioning under oath regarding their conduct in my case. Perhaps that opportunity will come someday.

Rod Rosenstein protégée Aaron Zelinsky whose misconduct in my case will be the subject of its own book was not so smart. In fact, Zelinsky made nine assertions under oath before the House Judiciary Committee that are provably false. In other words, Zelinsky lied to Congress for which he should be prosecuted.

The Washington Post later reported that the three top non-political career Prosecutors at the Department of Justice all denied under oath to the Inspector General that they had ever pressured the prosecutors in my case including Zelinsky who unfortunately made this fake claim under oath before the house judiciary committee.  In other words, Zelinsky lied to Congress. It’s perplexing why he has not yet been prosecuted.

The documentation of Zelinsky’s unethical and illegal behavior in the prosecution of my case will be fully outlined and documented in my upcoming book, “Roger Stone Did Nothing Wrong – My Political Persecution & The Loss of the 2020 Election.” This will make my formal complaint regarding his conduct to the Maryland Bar a copy and paste job.

On November 3, 2020, arguably the busiest media day of the year, the U.S. Department of Justice released the last remaining long-hidden sections of Muller’s Report in which he conceded that his financially and legally unlimited investigation had turned up “no factual evidence against me regarding Russian collusion WikiLeaks collaboration or the theft of John podesta’s emails. Incredibly Mueller is Report when I want to say that even if he had found evidence of such activity he had concluded that it would not have been illegal and would have been protected by the First Amendment.

While BuzzFeed reported that I was “vindicated, and The Washington Examiner carried the story, all of the major media outlets who had falsely accused me of treason or WikiLeaks collaboration reported… nothing.

The November 2020 revelations from DOJ released at a time to ensure the minimum of media coverage, prove that the charges against me were fabricated and, as I have publicly stated and were used to pressure me in order to coerce me into testifying falsely against President Trump. Unlike Michael Cohen I refused.

Then the fake news media began to recycle the same baseless accusations regarding January 6th. ABC News, was among the most debased and outrageous in their coverage. If the reporters and news executives guilty of character assassination in my case cannot be punished in court, they will burn for all eternity in hell and an indelible record of their dishonesty will be left so that their children and grandchildren will know that their parents were lying scumbags.

Notice how the ABC News headline above has now been completely debunked by Reuters. The efforts by the exact same media outlets who smeared me in the Russian collusion scam were completely recycled in the aftermath of the January 26^th disturbance. Their coverage was as stunning and breathtaking as their dishonesty in this new smear. After a virtual tsunami of irresponsible, fabricated,” guilt by association-based headlines and stories by the jackals in the corporate news media, Reuters reported last week is that a senior FBI official confirmed that the January 6th investigation had found no evidence against either Roger Stone or Alex Jones regarding the illegal events of January 6^th. Wait! You didn’t see it? Not surprising.

Once again, the very same fake news media outlets who for two years insisted that I was a “Russian traitor” and had illegally collaborated with WikiLeaks and the Russians to interfere in the 2020 election, those news outlets who failed to report Mueller’s stunning admission that he could find no proof of these smears began insisting that my presence in Washington on January 6^th and my congenial contact with individuals who may or may not have been involved in the disturbance at the Capitol on January 6^th somehow constitutes proof of my involvement or knowledge of the very strange series of events that day.

No media outlet has been more irresponsible in their smear of me than ABC News. “Seen with?” Isn’t this feeble attempt at “guilt by association” transparent and pathetic? Reuters essentially debunked multiple ABC News stories with their stunning story last week in which Senior Government Officials told Reuters that they found “no evidence” of any larger conspiracy involving anyone in President Trump’s inner or outer circle regarding the events of January 6^th.

I am consulting several of the most respected defamation attorneys in the country because of my intention to sue ABC News and several of their executives and reporters over their malicious and false smears of me. That said, unfortunately, based on previous Supreme Court decisions, because I am considered a “public figure” the bar to determine actual defamation is quite high. At the same time, certain ABC News reporters must be subjected to the same kind of public abuse based on their actions, as I was subjected to based on their lies.

I agree with U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, that it is time to revise the law regarding the defamation of public figures, to ensure fairer coverage of American citizens, and to hold the media responsible for their willful use of falsehood omission and distortion in their efforts to destroy the public reputation of anyone they target.

The “guilt by association” technique was carried to its extreme while failing to recognize that due to my epic two-year struggle for freedom and justice, and in my efforts to raise sufficient money for a legal defense after the Mueller nightmare had impoverished me and my family, I casually met and had my photograph taken with literally thousands of people. I have no more responsibility to know the name and background of every person who requests a photo nor am I responsible for all their actions, past, present, or future, but not according to ABC News.

While media outlets like ABC News, The Washington Post, and The New York Times willfully and purposely published falsehoods and inaccuracies, their greatest tool is the omission of salient facts. Below them is a whole subset of cretins like Seth Abrahamson who published his own delusional fever dreams because no “legitimate” news organization will employ him since doing so would assume legal responsibility and liability for the baseless horseshit this guy serves up as “news.”

By the way, Abrahamson’s claim that there were not one, but “two War Rooms” inside the Willard Hotel is a fantasy based on bullshit. His claim that Rudy Giuliani was running a War Room is total fiction. Just as his prediction of my “imminent” arrest on February 4, 2021, and his insistence that proof would emerge that I had “masterminded” the entire fiasco at the Capital. Scumbags like Seth Abrahamson are not censored on Twitter or Facebook while I am banned for life from both because of my “constant promotion of disinformation,” in other words, any political narrative that contradicts the conventional wisdom of the ruling elite. I am banned for life on Twitter but the Taliban, monsters who abuse women and children and who have no regard for human life, are not.

Bottom-feeder Seth Abrahamson actually makes a living by smearing me and then using my name for clickbait among the drooling anti-Trump leftists who dominate Twitter. It won’t end well for Abrahamson.

It is almost impossible to describe the experience of being vilified, smeared, censored, travel-restricted, terrorized, threatened, unconstitutionally gagged, legally lynched, nearly bankrupted, de-platformed, canceled, pardoned, and ultimately vindicated, particularly when your ultimate vindication never seems to get the level of media coverage that the original and in some cases fabricated attacks you received at the hands of the Democrat/corporate media/Deep State cabal.

The same prosecutors who said in their opening statement that my trial had nothing to do with President Trump used Trump’s name one hundred and thirty-two times in their closing statement and rebuttal to my defense.

The bloodlust on the American left because I successfully escaped the deadly snare so carefully laid for me by Robert Mueller (Andrew Weissmann), Congressman Adam Schiff and his confederates, the Red Chinese-compromised Eric Swalwell, and that little asshole from Texas, Joaquin Castro, whose political career has reached its zenith and whose trajectory, I assure you from this period forward is only downward. There is more than enough solid evidence of illegal handling of classified documents by every one of these House Democrat fanatics.

After living under a media-created cloud for two and a half years, essentially being gagged while I was lynched, and, by the grace of God having my “death sentence” to serve in the general population of a Covid-19-infested Georgia prison, where the Government insisted there were no existing Covid-19 cases, but in fact, there were hundreds and granting me an unlimited presidential pardon based on my failure to receive a fair trial and the obvious corruption of my trial itself. The President recognized that my Constitutional Right to a fair trial had been abridged and he answered my prayers when he granted me clemency.

The events of January 6^th in which I played no part, gave the exact same fake news media assassins who have yet to admit the falsity of their reporting about me, an opportunity to create a new cloud of suspicion based on nothing at all. The Reuters story of last Friday completely debunks the ABC News reports that the investigation of the January 6th incidents would embroil multiple top Trump associates, including yours truly. ABC News’ use of a harmless video in which I stood on the steps and in front of my hotel when I went out to greet supporters on the morning of January 6, this being necessary because the city’s Covid-19 rules prevented.

Just as in the “Russian Collusion” hoax, the truth of my innocence regarding anything pertaining to January 6^th will receive scant coverage from the same people who have yet to admit that they were wrong about “Russian Collusion” and that they relentlessly pushed a lie. From the beginning of my stunning and unnecessary gunpoint arrest in the predawn hours of January 25^th, 2019 when twenty-nine heavily armed FBI agents swarmed my home to Judge Amy Berman Jackson’s fifty-five-minute political diatribe at my sentencing that the case against me was contrived, politically motivated and that my trial was hopelessly corrupted by politics.

For eighteen months I was legally prohibited from telling my side of the story. With the publication of my next book, “Roger Stone Did Nothing Wrong – My Political Persecution & the Loss of the 2020 Election,” the hand in hand corruption of the Deep State and their corporate media facilitators will be fully exposed, and the public knowledge of the unethical activities of a number of public figures who have yet to answer for their crimes will be exposed. Karma is a bitch.

Sources at Reuters tell me that the two reports whose dogged coverage of the January 6^th conflict have been deluged with complaints from outraged leftists furious that these two journalists have simply reported the facts. Any claim of inappropriate or illegal activity pertaining to January 6^th by me has now been credibly documented to be categorically false. Don’t expect the people who lied for two years about my being a “Russian spy” to tell you the truth about January 6^th either.

It’s bad enough that the Biden Justice Department has filed an entirely fraudulent civil action against me regarding my back taxes. At the same time, my wife is waging a valiant struggle against Stage 4 cancer, a diagnosis brought on by two and a half years of relentless stress and pressure at the hands of Mueller and his thugs.

Those who want to help me in my legal struggle with these criminals can go to StoneDefenseFund.com. Those who want to help my wife and family finance the cutting-edge alternative homeopathic and holistic cancer therapies that Mrs. Stone is utilizing in her fight for life can go to StoneFamilyFund.com.

The American, and particularly the Holiday, book reader is already under assault by an avalanche of post-election books by “insiders” in the media regarding Donald Trump and the Trump Presidency.  As a New York Times best-selling author myself, I fully understand the cycle in which political books are strategically written and leaked, for the tabloid-type media and fit to leave their particular imprimatur on all things Trump.  

This is not a new phenomenon, important post-election books are a huge tradition in the swamp and have for years been strategically manipulated by winning politicians to put their “spin” on the events they participated in during a Presidency or Presidential campaign. 

Originally these books were actually published by Newsweek and Time Magazine but in more recent years, reporters who actually covered the events of the Trump Presidency are now jockeying for market share amongst readers who despise Donald Trump and his family. and who utterly reject Donald Trump’s extraordinary accomplishments as a political outsider. 

In the past, these times were used by old Washington hands to aggrandize their role in history.  Today, these books are designed to essentially recycle the anti-Trump narrative repeated over and over again by the “mainstream” media, but embellish it with a few – probably false – revelations that the book pitched to the Trump-hating readers market, is titillated. 

Foremost and worst of these, is Michael Wolff, who wrote at least two vicious cut-and-paste hit jobs on Trump, one of them very clearly co-authored by Steve Bannon,  Fire and Fury: Inside The Trump White House. This is the one where Wolff tells us that Bannon is the genius behind the Trump Revolution but also tells us that Bannon says that Trump is “not a billionaire but a scumbag” as well as saying that the Trump Family Real Estate Company and The Trump Organization is a “criminal enterprise.”  

Here is a demonstration of the absurdity of these book generated attacks on President Trump:

The Daily Beast: New Michael Wolff Book Says Murdoch Told Fox to Call Arizona Against Trump: ‘F*ck Him.’

The Mercury News: Ivanka Trump tried to calm ‘agitated’ Trump on Jan. 6, acting as ‘stable pony,’ new book says.

Business Insider: ‘That’s my money!’ Trump exploded at Brad Parscale over stories about his lavish lifestyle and spending, according to a new book.

PoliticalFlare: Book Says Trump Raged After George Floyd Unrest, ‘I’ve Done All This Stuff for the Blacks.’

Forbes: ‘Where Would He Be Without Me?’: Trump rips into Kavanaugh in a new book.

Yahoo General Milley Called Trump’s Election Lies ‘The Gospel of the Führer,’ book says.

HuffPost: ‘You Can’t F**king Talk To Me That Way!’ Trump yelled at Gen. Milley amid protests, book says.

TMZ: Trump Threatened over Hitler quote … tried to influence book.

CNBC: Trump praised Hitler to the chief of staff John Kelly during Europe trip, new book claims. 

TalkingPointsMemo: Morning Memo: New Book Says Trump Claimed Hitler ‘Did A Lot Of Good Things.’

Business Insider: Trump called McConnell ‘a stupid person’ and a ‘knucklehead’ for not eliminating the filibuster during his term, the book says.

CNN Politics: Trump said whoever ‘leaked’ info on his White House bunker stay should be ‘executed,’ new book claims.

The Guardian: “A madman with millions of followers,” what the new Trump books tell us.

MSN: Trump’s Inner Circle Worried He Was ‘Dangerous for the Country’ New Book Says.

USA Today: “If George Washington came back from the dead,” in a new book, Trump brags that even a founding father might not have beaten him.

NPR: An Analysis Of New Books About Donald Trump’s Presidency.

Politico: Trump rages over post-presidential books he did interviews for.

Washingtonian: “Nine Juicy Details to Come Out of the Barrage of New Trump Books.”

The Guardian: “I Alone Can Fix It,” Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker on their Trump bestseller.

NPR: ‘Michael Wolff’s Third Strike At Trump White House Has Hits And Misses.”

CNN Politics: “The single most revealing fact in the new Trump books.”

The New York Times: “Two Accounts of Donald Trump’s Final Year in Office, One More Vivid and Apt Than the Other.”

The New York Times: “What Do Trump and Marinara Have in Common?”

Slate: “Michael Wolff’s Latest Page-Turner Gives Trump’s Final Year the Trashy Treatment It Deserves.”

CBS News: In a new book, “Top U.S. general feared Trump would attempt a coup after the election loss.”

CNN Politics: ‘They’re not going to f**king succeeded’: Top generals feared Trump would attempt a coup after the election, according to a new book.

The Independent: Drunk Rudy Giuliani told Trump to just say he won on election night, book claims.

Yahoo: “Donald Trump Jr. says he was ‘just f—ing’ with Mitt Romney by calling for him to be expelled from the Senate,” new book says.

For some strange reason, President Trump himself granted Wolff a live record interview for his book.  Trump World Hustler, Jason Miller urged Trump Attorney David Schoen to speak to Wolff but to no avail.  Wolff’s claim in his book that lawyer, David Schoen, did anything less than his full duty to represent the President of the United States in the impeachment, is a complete willingness to make his arguments on the Senate floor false and defamatory.  Wolff never bothered to ask Attorney Schoen his version of events or make any effort to confirm this falsehood.  

Others pursuing this genre are Michael C. Bender, formerly of the Palm Beach Post and now of The Wall Street Journal.  Olivia Nuzzi of New York Magazine, one of the most precious knife artists in journalism today, is doing a trump book with Ryan Lizza of POLITICO. Jonathan Martin, one of the better-dressed reporters is doing a book with Alex Burns also of the New York Times. Jennifer Jacobs who covered the Trump White House for Bloomberg is penning a Trump tome. As is John Karl of NBC.

Robert Costa of the Washington Post, a sloppy journalist who actually reported that I had been fired from Trump’s 2016 campaign when in fact I not only resigned but supplied my letter of resignation to two reporters. They were also I was going to resign in advance including Marc Caputo then of the Miami Herald. I had decided I could be more effective on Trump’s behalf outside the campaign structure and that life was just too short to have to deal with an asshole like Cory Lewandowski.

Trump insiders Bill Barr, Kelly Anne Conway, and Peter Navarro are writingTrump books perhaps in their own defense. What the market is for true pro-Trump books remains to be seen. Not since Abraham Lincoln has any political figure had to weather the overwhelming vituperations of the media of the day. The big enchilada in the Trump book bonanza will be The New York Times political reporter, Maggie Haberman.  Because Haberman covered Trump in earlier stints at the New York Daily News, The New York Post, Politico, and now writes for the Old Gray Lady, Haberman probably has a better understanding of Donald Trump and what makes him tick.  While the President has sometimes been critical of her reporting, I know from my own discussions with him that while he regards her as an adversary and is quite wary of her, he “likes her as a person.” In other words, Trump is obsessed with her. To a certain extent, she may be just as obsessed with him. There’s definitely an Ahab and the White Whale dynamic going on between those two.

In the meantime,  the very fact that these books are going to be published created a modern-day tsunami of click-bait in which all kinds of allegations are made against Donald Trump, the First Lady, or members of the Trump family.  This leads to ridiculous headlines, such as Trump telling military leaders that they were “fucked up” when they refused presidential orders to quash the BLM /Antifa riots early in the last year of Trump’s presidency. The real news of course is that the Pentagon’s leaders ignored a presidential order which is an act of treason, as well as the fact Trump should have utilized the military to maintain order because the protection of the American people is his first responsibility as President. The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of staff should’ve been court-martialed for refusing such a presidential order. Sadly, left-wing reporters don’t see these realities.

Due to my political prosecution and essentially the fabrication of charges against me, as well as the Soviet-style show trial in Washington D.C., in which the judge legally prohibited every reasonable, legal defense based on the revelations of the DOJ on November 3, 2020,  exculpatory evidence was withheld from me leading to an initial grant of clemency in which I avoided prison time and ultimately led to a Presidential pardon on December 23, 2020.  My own upcoming book, “Roger Stone Did Nothing Wrong: My Political Persecution And The Loss Of The 2020 Election”  will cover some of the same ground as a number of the “Trump books” out now.

The American political rally is making a comeback. Traditionally, rallies of huge numbers of citizens in American politics is a phenomenon that predates the advent of television and cable news. Presidential candidates and party organizations would turn out thousands to rally for their tickets. 

With the advent of television, the political rally was reduced to an advanced, team-generated crowd for appearances by presidential candidates. Traditionally, crowd size grew as the election drew closer. Tellingly, a candidate’s inability to draw a large crowd – as in the cases of Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden – is anecdotal evidence of their weakness.

But what we are seeing today with a growing number of grassroots rallies across the country drawing thousands of citizens in support of a cause and as an act of protest, is not only something new, but the direct outgrowth of the now-raging frustration of Republicans, conservatives, Christians, and free-thinkers. As the abject and baseless censorship on social media, as well as the de-platforming of anyone whose views are not aligned with the ruling D.C./Hollywood cabal, regular American’s are finding strength in numbers at these rallies. 

It is vital to note that not only are thousands of people turning out for these patriotic and free speech-oriented events, but they are actually paying for the privilege of being there. Paying to attend a political rally is unprecedented in American political history. 

In other words, average citizens are doing what they can still do – gather in a group and express their views and hear from leaders in the movement they support. More importantly, however, attendance at these mass events is a protest of the status-quo; the 2020 election results, the impact of lockdowns, the dangers of the Covid-19 vaccination, and the unconstitutional treatment of the January 6th detainees. 

In the last several months, I have spoken at several of these rallies and can report that grassroots enthusiasm has never been this high. It is important, however, to say that attending and speaking at a rally that takes place over a several-day period, with a large cast of speakers, does not mean that I subscribe to the views of everyone who speaks. Despite the 2020 election having an extraordinary number of anomalies and irregularities, I have never believed that the results of the 2020 election would be reversed and know of no legal or constitutional procedure to even do so.

The early success of Clay Clark’s Reawaken America Tour has spawned dozens of imitators. Any time there is a successful “outsider” political movement, whether it be Ross Perot or Donald Trump, the effort will attract a disproportionate number of people who have never been in politics before. It will therefore bring a disproportionate number of grifters, self-aggrandizers, opportunists, and social misfits. 

While some of these rallies appear to be “get rich quick” schemes for entrepreneurs daydreaming of large numbers of patriots paying hundreds of dollars to listen to speakers and share camaraderie all the while filling the cash register, I prefer to believe that this rash of imitators is a grassroots reaction to the stifling of free speech and the growing infringement of our Constitutional Rights. 

The danger to this robust uprising of citizen participation is the growing restriction of both public and private spaces. Perhaps the Deep State will end these rallies the way they ended free association on social media. My advice? Attend one of these inspirational events while you can and make your voice heard.

No one should underestimate the tenacious drive, or brass knuckle tactics, of recently resigned New York governor Andrew Cuomo. The New York Post reports that the former governor is plotting a comeback, are undercut by a filing not widely reported in the New York press

While it is true that Cuomo is still sitting on tens of millions of dollars in campaign funds, Governor Cuomo quietly filed his application for service retirement per OSC. The date of retirement is September 1st, 2021.

Unlike some politicians, there is no evidence that Cuomo has used his power as governor to enrich himself preferring to use his high-pressure tactics of raising campaign cash to benefit his campaigns  In other words he needs the money. That’s why he agreed to resign: stopping the impeachment which would prevent him from collecting retirement.

The implications of Cuomo’s resignation are far broader than just the final act of a methodical, vindictive, and powerful governor who used all the levers of power to keep his intra-party rivals and the media at bay.

It is entirely conceivable that Andrew Cuomo could be the last white male nominated for state-wide office by the New York Democratic Party. While Republican registration in the state has dropped to all-time lows, with GOP registration in New York City now at just 18%, the white Catholic working-class exodus in the New York Democrat party has also receded. This shift in voter base explains the defeat of Queens County Democratic Chairman and Congressman Joe Crowley by socialist AOC. The ascent of socialists has dramatically changed the makeup of the electorate in the New York State Democratic Party. State Senator, moderate Democrat, and former NYPD Captain Eric Adams was able to squeeze out a victory in the New York City Democratic Primary for Mayor because he was an African-American.

Of those considering challenging Governor Kathy Hochul, all are minorities including the probably front runner Attorney General Leticia James who’s investigation effectively ended the reign of Governor Cuomo.

This trend is problematic for the Democratic party corporate way with congresswoman AOC openly considering a primary challenge to US Senat Majority Leader, Chuck Schumer.

The socialists and left-wing extremists, nurtured for votes by the big city Democratic machines in New York City, Buffalo, and Albany, are now in control of the party and have nothing but contempt for moderate, or even labor Democrats.

Any come back bid by  Andrew Cuomo would not only have to deal with the damage his reputation has suffered in the “#MeToo” scandal, but would be bucking the trend of history.