Top Trump advisor Roger Stone joined Meet The Press Daily with Chuck Todd to discuss the recent strikes in Syria, the ongoing battle between Jared Kushner and Steve Bannon, how President Donald Trump is keeping his campaign promises, and why the Russia lies are complete and utter bunk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbJ1FLvvFUo
Stay tuned to StoneColdTruth.Com for all your political news updates.
A British feminist released a YouTube video requesting viewers for cash to establish a museum dedicated to vaginas, according to Tuesday reports.
Florence Schechter, a personality that is YouTube, decided to open the museum after realizing that while you will find plenty of dick museums, the world doesn’t have any museums centered around vaginas, reports Heat Street.
From Youtube:
There is a penis museum in Iceland. Which is pretty cool. But there is no vagina museum. Anywhere. In the world.
I was pretty miffed when I learnt this but I thought, there’s only one way to rectify this. Make one.
Thank you so much for stopping and watching this video. I’ve put a tonne more info below about the kind of things I want to achieve in the idea development stage of this project and how you can contribute. Any small amount you can give genuinely helps. If you can’t give but would still like to help, please share this page on your social media so it can find someone who can 🙂
Patreon page is here: www.patreon.com/vaginamuseum
“I understood there’s no area focused on the female anatomy,” Schechter clarified in her fundraising video. “ I was pretty distressed about that, but I understood that there is just one way to rectify this, and that was to make my own vagina museum.”
When they can afford it, Schechter acknowledged that opening the museum will be costly, but requested her observers only to give.
It’s difficult to know what won’t work and what’s going to work. She plans on creating numerous events to learn what women would need to view in a vagina museum.
Schechter first declared her plans last month to start the vagina museum. She needs the museum to depict topics like masturbation and abortion.
“It will investigate things like gender and sexuality identity and contentious subjects like abortion and contraception and masturbation and permission,” she described to The Independent.
President’s Trump campaign workers are squaring off against GOP veterans for essential jobs in federal agencies — and increasingly finding themselves on the losing side.
From the State Department to the Environmental Protection Agency, the campaign staffers, who call themselves “originals” whine they are being pushed aside, according to the web site.
The originals say they targeted by damaging leaks and been kept out of meetings. A number of the Trump supporters, many of whom offered to work during the campaign for him, have already leave their posts that were new.
“You are always watching your back,” said Sid Bowdidge, a Trump campaign staffer who Politico said resign his Energy Department job after reports he made anti-Muslim slurs on social media. He attributed leaks for the reports by rival co-workers, the website noted.
“It doesn’t bode well for a cohesive team to be successful toward a common aim,” he said. “How can you when folks are looking over their shoulder to determine if they will have a knife in their own back?”
Most of the campaign loyalists were put in agencies on Inauguration Day to assist smooth the transition that was presidential. They’re generally referred to as the “beachhead” team.
CBS News reports that about a dozen members of the beachhead team in the U.S. Agriculture have been told they would not receive long-term positions at the department.
Other agencies, including Transportation and Treasury, have notified former campaign workers that their jobs are finishing, the network news said.
And Politico reported many are angry over their treatment.
“The perception (among agency staff) is, we were Mr. Trump’s goons who were great at knocking on doors, but can not do much else,” said one former campaign staffer, who was not offered a full time job at his bureau
Some Cabinet secretaries have privately complained about being made to take employees with little, if any, Politico, relevant expertise. But the Trump loyalists insist they don’t deserved to be thrown to the side.
“The swamp is winning the battle. And longtime effort staffers are proving to function as first victims.”
(By Roger Stone) I know when I publicly rebuke Joy Ann Reid i will be berated as both a racist and misogynist. I am neither. My longtime activism for reform of our racist state and federal drug laws and my determination to treat men and women equally in all respects including criticism say otherwise.
But in a recent rant for fake news site ,the failing Daily Beast ,Ms. Reid spins a false narrative (sans any evidence that Russian interests aided the election of Donald Trump). But in her wild-ass screed she says “There was Trump’s longtime crony Roger Stone, Manafort’s old lobbying partner, who pushed Trump to favor the U.S.S.R.’s point of view over Ronald Reagan’s during the 1980s, when Vlad Putin was still a KGB agent….”. This is a bald face lie. I have never offered any such advice to Donald Trump and there is no memo or public or private comment that would bear this out.
Now I see Ms. Reid losing it on Twitter. Guess she is not used to being challenged. Words matter, Joy Ann, and you are busted.
It is not 1980 and America’s foreign policy has different challenges because of the failure of the neocon adventures of the Bush 1, Clinton, Bush 2 and Obama. Donald Trump has no illusions about the reality of the Russian gulag and Putin’s days in the KGB. But because Trump favors hard-headed negotiation and detente over war does not make him soft of Russia or Putin.
We’ve had enough costly foreign wars. In Syria, Assad funds Hamas and Hezbollah and is backed by the Russian while ISIS backed by the Saudis seek to topple him. Hillary promised the Intelligence community and the pentagon and expansion of the proxy war in Syria including a US enforced “no-fly zone” inviting a confrontation with the heavily armed Russians who’s bases are nearby while our are around the globe. Trump’s wants to try for a deal for peace.
Under Obama and Clinton we transferred technology to Russia and did nothing when he rolled into Crimea ( where a plebiscite with near universal voter turn-out had 80 % wanting to go back to Mother Russia) or Syria. The technology transfers continued. The Re-set was a joke.
So, I’m sorry Bill Maher, the entire assault on Donald Trump and the baseless charge that his campaign colluded with the Russians is a story-line pushed by the intelligence agencies apoplectic over the fact that Hillary is not able to deliver the expansion of the proxy war in Syria that she promised them.
In fact this false Russian-Trump collusion story line was first advanced by John Podesta himself to divert attention from his cozy multi-million dollar business deals with Putin’s clique.
There is no real evidence or proof whatsoever that I knew about the hacking of John Podesta’s email by Wikileaks in advance. My tweet that “Podesta’s time in the barrel will come” means only that his business activities in Russia would come under public scrutiny as indeed they did with over 50 stories on the subject published between August and election day, including the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg News.
The phony charge that I knew anything about the scope , focus or content of Wikileaks ultimate disclosures on Hillary Clinton in October despite claims to the contrary by Senator Mark Warner, Congressman Adam Schiff and other Democrats, are not sustained by the facts or the public record.
Any inference that my casual and now totally public exchange with Guccifer 2.0 constitutes collusion with a Russian Agent is disproved by the circumstances, content and timing of that exchange. The now- public exchange is both innocuous and benign and it took place 6-weeks after the publication of the DNC material by Wikileaks.
Based on the fact that this is the only communication I had with Guccifer 2.0 (who I do not concede is definitely a Russian asset based on the faulty track record of our intelligence services on such matters and a body of evidence to prove otherwise) does not constitute collusion. A simple on-line search will show there are many differing views on who, if anyone, Guccifer works for, many of them more authoritative and logical that the CIA’s “assessment”
More troubling is the fact that the New York Times reported on January 20, 2017 that I was the subject of government surveillance, specifically a wiretap in their investigation into alleged Russian collusion with the Trump campaign. I demand to know what was the evidence or probably cause presented to a judge to obtain a warrant which allowed the violation of my Constitutional right to privacy.
If, however, this surveillance was conducted under the authority of a FISA warrant then the leak of the wiretaps to theNew York Times constitutes a felony. There is also material in the left-wing fake news sites Rawstory and Smoking Gun including the very existence of the innocuous direct messages between Guccifer 2.0 and myself that could have only been gleaned from similar leaks. Very clearly someone here has broken the law.
Joy Ann Reid lowers herself when the Daily Beast links her misguided piece to a fake news site ,Smoking Gun that is rife with falsehoods about me and likely to implicated in the violation the law before the truth about Russiagate becomes known.
A television series called Law and Order started during the elder Bush presidency and continued throughout the Clinton administration. In this series, actor Steven Hill is the Ivy League-educated, pro-choice, anti-capital punishment and politically correct district attorney for New York County. Hill’s fictional character named “Adam Schiff” is a liberal Democrat but principled; he stands up to his powerful, corrupt friends who are part of the liberal establishment.
This Law and Order series, that is, the flagship and not the SVU spin-off, ended a few months before the election to Congress in November 2000 of a real person named Adam Schiff, who now represents California’s 28th Congressional District. Schiff had defeated my friend, the admirable and impressive Congressman Jim Rogan who four years later wrote Rough Edges: My Unlikely Road from Welfare to Washington, an engaging autobiography far more inspiriting than anything Schiff has written … or will ever write. Jim is now an Orange County, Calif. superior court judge who President Donald Trump would do well to nominate to the federal judiciary.
Back to the contemporary Adam Schiff, who actually resembles the television character except that the fictional prosecutor was a man of principle. In contrast, Congressman Schiff, you may recall, favors politics over substance. For example, on Aug. 3, 2015, practically before the ink was dry on the Iran treaty (that Obama claimed was not a treaty) and without disclosure of its secret protocols,” Schiff (a supposed “Iran-deal skeptic”) articulated all the defects of the agreement before he then disingenuously came to the punch line, a non-sequitur: he announced he would support the reckless sell-out.
Chameleon Adam Schiff remains the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. He is known mainly as a “come hither” CNN talking head, a favorite because he speaks with gravity, maybe even gravitas, beyond credibility to authority; in short, he is ponderous blowhard. He packages the most partisan talking points as if he is the vessel of divine interpretation. Some would say that Schiff is pompous; he is what Simon Cowell would call “self-indulgent.”
Thus, when Hillary Clinton, flouting national security protocols, arguably violated federal law that had been applied to others, the serious looking Schiff was a dependable stalwart, appearing stern and analytical, he would rationalize each violation.
Last week House intelligence Committee Chairman David Nunes erred in immediately advising the White House of findings of possible government snooping into the people around Donald Trump. Nunes apologized for his lapse in judgment, that is, he indeed should have alerted his colleagues, including Schiff first. But to hear Schiff, absorbed in contrived righteous indignation, tell it, Nunes had crossed Schiff’s imaginary red line, into an abyss of rampant corruption.
Schiff is forever casting aspersions on the people around Trump, who – he implies – were involved in indiscreet conversations and nefarious machinations, to sabotage the Clinton campaign and throw the election to Trump. No matter that the total Clinton effort, enhanced by CNN, the networks and major newspapers, and Facebook and Google, Wall Street, K Street, labor unions, et. al spent perhaps three times what the Trump supporters spent – that with all this, she was an awful candidate who ran a screwed-up campaign. Why acknowledge that, when Schiff can instead say, “The Russians did it!” In Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan?
Schiff has publicly tossed around the names of suspects. In reaction, the guilty would retain lawyer, refuse to appear without a subpoena, and then appear privately to take the Fifth Amendment. But when Schiff baited pugilist Roger Stone, Schiff got more than he bargained for: Stone, who has called Schiff a “small town Joe McCarthy,” has publicly and repeatedly volunteered to testify, in public, as soon as possible.
Republican Nunes would do well to take Roger up on his offer, and put Democrat Schiff in the interrogator’s chair, which could actually become the hot seat. Let’s see Schiff and Roger go mano a mano. If Roger can calibrate his nastiness and tone down his conspiracy theories, he can overwhelm the pretentious Schiff and win the sound bites. Roger is colorful and engages in performance art, that is, for the public hearings, he will offer high drama guerrilla theater. He will spin Schiff (before, during and after the public hearings) so fast in circles with a circumference far beyond the reach of Schiff, unable to cope with the spontaneity.
Someone recently observed that the intelligence community does not always listen to bad people, but interesting people. So it remains to be seen whether operatives in the intelligence community, a portion of which disdains Trump, eavesdropped on his lieutenants. This is not to say that President Barack Obama ordered that Trump be “wiretapped” – thus far an unproven charge beyond rhetorical overkill.
Schiff says Stone was in touch with a Russian hacker. But if Roger were engaged in misdeeds, why did he talk and write about these alleged transgressions contemporaneously? Schiff will portray Roger as a Watergate dirty trickster; but Roger, in turn, will depict Obama’s wrongdoings as “worse than Watergate” – and Schiff as a cover-up artist. In any public hearing, expect Roger to play to the cameras and go on offense.
Roger will ask Schiff why he, as a junior federal prosecutor, had to try former FBI agent Richard Miller three times for passing secret documents to the Soviets before successfully convicting Miller. Roger will reprise that Schiff called the proposed Benghazi hearings a “colossal waste of time” and then joined the committee to “add value” – i.e., to obfuscate the Obama administration’s scheme that election year against Romney, to claim terrorism was under control, and that the embassy attack was a protest against a movie disrespectful of Islam.
Roger will ask Schiff whether he will alibi for FBI Director James Comey, particularly when he was a U.S. Attorney: Why was Clinton national security aide Sandy Berger not prosecuted for being caught on tape stealing classified materials that showed how Clinton would not authorize killing Osama bin Laden when he was in our sights? Or why did President Bill Clinton give con artist Marc Rich a pardon after donating to the Clinton foundation?
Congressman Adam Schiff and his colleagues who insist they must question former Trump aides should be careful about what they wish for. Take Schiff, for example. He talks like he is reading from a legal brief. Expect Roger Stone to go after Schiff in his opening statement, to interrupt Schiff often, and to answer questions on his own terms, always ending on offense. Roger will not let up until every camera and reporter has left the committee room, and then he will follow them down the hallway.
I can’t wait to watch.
Arnold Steinberg, is the author of WHIPLASH! From JFK to Donald Trump, A Political Odyssey (forthcoming, June 2017). He is a political strategist whose previous books on politics and media were graduate school texts.
Source: http://www.westernjournalism.com/adam-schiff-vs-roger-stone/